No, it's still not correct and mixing the two approaches increases the cognitive load/overhead and potential bugs. You insist your future devs be adept at a dead-end and the idiosyncrasies that made it such instead of embracing ideas that span several high-level languages ... You also gloss the fact that once one knows enough to be able to wrap CGIs to PSGI, which isn't always easy or possible, one knows better than to write the stuff that needs to be wrapped in the first place.
Now that is even more ridiculous than your previous statement
You can write crap for every backend. The difference between CGI and PSGI is trivial , there is no cognitive load
|
|
If you used any kind of abstraction like CGI::Application... then there is no difference of any kind between running on PSGI or CGI
PSGI is great, bashing CGI is weak
In reply to Re^12: Shortest/quickest way for Perl to take POST data it receives and send a POST request with this data to another URL?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Shortest/quickest way for Perl to take POST data it receives and send a POST request with this data to another URL?
by tunafish
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |