Certainly an interesting idea—and not out of keeping with other similar constructs in Perl. But having said that I can't help but think that it isn't really a good idea.

First of all, say you adapt the void context approach...doesn't that begin to erode the idea of void context? Seems to me that the fuzzier the concept, the less useful. Second thing, since 'Side effects happen!', I'd have to side with the code curmudgeons(tm) and 'just so no!' Don't know about you, but I've more often shot myself in the foot with elegant improvements, than with other method of choice.

hsm

In reply to Re: DWIM Part Nineteen: Unary Operators in Void Context by hsmyers
in thread DWIM Part Nineteen: Unary Operators in Void Context by CheeseLord

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.