Well, if you read back your post you'll see that it wasn't clear at all, which is why I asked if it works out of the box in
Well, it seems clear enough to me in Re: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite where I said you need -DEFINES
When you asked if it works out of the box in Re^4: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite, I didn't answer the question at all ( Re^5: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite ), I basically said figure it out by reading what I said and trying stuff
but I did answer to walto ( Re^4: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite), basically no it doesn't work out of the box because it requires -DEFINES
Both answer also seem clear enough to me, maybe a bit short and non-repetitive ... what can I say I'm not chatty
In reply to Re^9: Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Using the unicode61 tokenizer in DBD::SQLite
by elef
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |