1/2 could be almost any number. The reply was more to shake up your thinking a little to make you think more in terms of "let's try the simple way first". Remember: premature optimisation is the root of all evil.
The important rule of thumb is: "If the code changes take longer than the run time saved, it's fast enough already".
In reply to Re^3: is this the most efficient way to double-parse a large file?
by GrandFather
in thread is this the most efficient way to double-parse a large file?
by jasonl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |