XML::Compile does not belong in this list: it interprets the output of XML::LibXML, where the other modules are mainly only parsers.
Have a look at XML::LibXML::Simple, which is XML::Simple based on XML::LibXML. How does that compare? And XML::Twig?
It seems your benchmark hits some other resource limit for XML::Fast/XML::LibXML. Probably you need a larger XML source in memory to compare the three fasters parsers.
In reply to Re: Is it wiser to move on from XML::Simple to XML::Compile
by markov
in thread Is it wiser to move on from XML::Simple to XML::Compile
by mohan2monks
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |