Does your random number generator pass the usual statistical tests for randomness?
How is it better than the various Math::Random modules, especially Math::Random::MT?
What is the theoretical foundation of your random generator?
In reply to Re: New software TRNG
by Corion
in thread New software TRNG
by tim.qfs
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |