I also saw that the only reply by ler224 was to CountZero's first reply and only very shortly after the timestamp of the OP — and it did not address the pertinent part of the Count's suggestion! Not the sort of engagement one hopes to see.
In reply to Re^4: Argument "" Isn't numeric in numeric eq (==)
by AnomalousMonk
in thread Argument "" Isn't numeric in numeric eq (==)
by ler224
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |