What if instead of trying to bend Perl to be like ... well ... what language are you actually trying to mimic here? ... what if instead you just got used to Perl being Perl? I can understand a code policy requiring an explicit return statement ensured either by code review or (if such thing is possible) using Perl::Critic, but no matter what way you do it this is only ever gonna cause confusion and pain. I'm pretty sure you could do something using source code filters or somesuch hackery, but you really do not want to do that!

Jenda
Enoch was right!
Enjoy the last years of Rome.

In reply to Re: Hope a subroutine will return undef by default by Jenda
in thread Hope a subroutine will return undef by default by qj1020

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.