Secondly, how does it compare with Damian's Regexp::Common? I think the best way to do your module would either be as part of that, or as a wrapper around it. If the wrapper approach fits what you want, then I think an excellent "proof of concept" would be a partial translation into another language, for instance a (limited) Regexp::Francais.
In reply to Re (tilly) 1: Pondering Regex::English
by tilly
in thread Pondering Regex::English
by chromatic
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |