While I can't disagree that maintaining a standard naming structure a Good Thing, I have to say that I agree with Jeffrey Friedl regarding "regexp": it's a blight on the language. I speak English and a bit of French and I can't imagine any speakers in either language finding "regexp" to roll off the tongue easier than "regex". In fact, I find it hard to imagine that speakers in any language would enjoy that P on the end. "regexp" sounds like something Sylvester the Cat would spit out in conversation if he were conversant with Perl.
I don't know who started the "regexp" naming scheme on the CPAN, but I was at a talk that Damian gave recently and unless I drastically misunderstood him, he also thought that "regexP" was an abomination.
Which is my roundabout way of saying that I get chills up my spine every time I hear someone trying to say 'regexp'.
'Nuff said :)
</rant>This node was not brought to you by the letter 'P'.
Cheers,
Ovid
Vote for paco!
Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.
In reply to (Ovid - a blight on the language) Re(2): Pondering Regex::English
by Ovid
in thread Pondering Regex::English
by chromatic
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |