Yes, I did, after reading Moose test file I was pointed to, which also uses MetaCPAN::API. By that time my own script already worked.
Moose does have a good reason to roll its own. Look at the list of expected failures, which they nicely documented.
I used the modules I already had available and did not realize I also had MetaCPAN::API installed. Now I do.
I see a value for all three approaches. Maybe I'll simplify to using Test::DependentModules now that I am aware of it. I did look, but probably typoed on Dependant :/
$ modlist depending $ modlist dependant Module name Description + Version Statistics::DependantTTest $ modlist dependent Module name Description + Version MooseX::Attribute::Dependent MooseX::Attribute::Dependent::Meta::Role::ApplicationToClass MooseX::Attribute::Dependent::Meta::Role::ApplicationToRole MooseX::Attribute::Dependent::Meta::Role::Attribute MooseX::Attribute::Dependent::Meta::Role::Class MooseX::Attribute::Dependent::Meta::Role::Composite MooseX::Attribute::Dependent::Meta::Role::Method::Accessor MooseX::Attribute::Dependent::Meta::Role::Method::Constructor MooseX::Attribute::Dependent::Meta::Role::Role Mpp::BuildCheck::architecture_independent Test::DependentModules WAIT::Table::Independent $
My English can probably be improved a lot
In reply to Re^2: Will I break CPAN?
by Tux
in thread Will I break CPAN?
by Tux
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |