In C, a comma operator is a "sequence point", meaning a statement such as y = (++x, ++x, ++x); is perfectly valid. (But (++x + ++x); is undefined behavior.) Comma in declaration list, initializers, parameter list, ..., is not an operator but a punctuator.
perlop says a comma in list context is "just the list argument separator". This is not a case with operator precedence. Indeed, it's a nasty bug!
perl -le '$c = 0; print @$_ for map { [$c, $c += $_] } (2,6,5,7);' perl -le '$c = 0; print @$_ for map { ["$c", $c += $_] } (2,6,5,7);'
In reply to Re: Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value ... (bug)
by oiskuu
in thread Why does the first $c evaluate to the incremented value in [$c, $c += $_] ?
by smls
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |