I suspect the answer lies in the reference to "leave_scope" - the underline makes me think this might be some internal subroutine in perl. But I wouldn't know where to begin to investigate.
See Scope.c:Perl_leave_scope(), the default case.
In a nutshell, something has been found on the (Perl) stack that has a type value that is not a real type value. That suggests stack corruption, which could come about in many ways.
In reply to Re: panic: leave_scope inconsistency
by BrowserUk
in thread panic: leave_scope inconsistency
by davidfilmer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |