One would hope that the top-down programming discipline would short-cut this, at least a little. By this I mean working out higher-level logic after considering as many of the aspects of the problem as is feasible. Then actually testing this logic as if it were a program with realistic data.
But I have to agree, that breath of simplicity does seem to be a result of after-the-fact fiddling.
In reply to Re: Code that feels good
by dhammaBum
in thread Code that feels good
by scott
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |