Indeed - I have thought about extensibility and the SQL dialects, but I really think those should come after there is some generic type definition instead of strings getting passed around. But I don't want to write the code for the generic data type myself :)
In reply to Re^2: RFC: Name and/or API for module ("Type::FromData")
by Corion
in thread RFC: Name and/or API for module ("Type::FromData")
by Corion
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |