Thank you for the name suggestion! I usually come up with three level names, but I am under the impression that they are considered too unwieldly by other people more adept with naming things. But I like the name...
I try to keep the functionality of generating SQL and executing SQL separate, as usually I prefer to review DDL and manually run it with a user that has the appropriate permissions. DBI might still be needed to import the appropriate SQL_ type constants, but that wouldn't imply the DBIx namespace for me.
In reply to Re^2: RFC: Name and/or API for module ("Type::FromData")
by Corion
in thread RFC: Name and/or API for module ("Type::FromData")
by Corion
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |