Laurent_R has already posted a reply that covers important points I had wanted to make.
Let me say this in addition. You're trying to be helpful and that's very good, but it doesn't help to offer wrong advice. The reason I almost always post code as cut/pastes from command-line executions is that, in addition to providing a complete context for execution, the code is actually executed and so is known to be at least syntactically correct — and maybe even has a chance of being semantically correct.
In reply to Re^4: RegExp substitution
by AnomalousMonk
in thread RegExp substitution
by Keystone
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |