I'll apologize up front--I'm not answering your question. Instead, I'm going to provide a couple comments on your code.
After applying these two suggestions to your subroutine, I get this:
############################################################ #specifica cosa deve fare la subroutine edit ############################################################ sub edit { my $file = $_; # only operate on html files if ((-e $file) && (! -d $file) && (/.html?/)){ open (FH, "<",$file) || die $!; my $tree = HTML::Tree->new(); $tree->parse_file($file) || die $!; # The main div contains the post of interest my $getmaindiv = $tree->look_down(_tag => "div",id => "post_princ +ipale") || die $!; print $getmaindiv->as_HTML, "\n"; close FH; } }
Most of your subroutine is inside an if statement. In cases like this, I prefer[*] to simply return if the case isn't met, then you save an indentation level, reducing the visual complexity a bit.
sub edit { my $file = $_; # only operate on html files return unless (-e $file) && (! -d $file) && (/.html?/); open (FH, "<",$file) || die $!; my $tree = HTML::Tree->new(); $tree->parse_file($file) || die $!; # The main div contains the post of interest my $getmaindiv = $tree->look_down(_tag => "div",id => "post_princ +ipale") || die $!; print $getmaindiv->as_HTML, "\n"; close FH; }
Now that the code is a little easier to read, I notice that you're not actually using the file handle you open. You're using the HTML parsers ability to accept a filename instead of a file handle. So I'd just remove the file handle code:
sub edit { my $file = $_; # only operate on html files return unless (-e $file) && (! -d $file) && (/.html?/); my $tree = HTML::Tree->new(); $tree->parse_file($file) || die $!; # The main div contains the post of interest my $getmaindiv = $tree->look_down(_tag => "div",id => "post_princ +ipale") || die $!; print $getmaindiv->as_HTML, "\n"; }
[*] Just one of my preferences. Of course all of my suggestions are based on my preferences, but the other ones are pretty-well accepted, while this one is the most discretionary. Since I'm just another programmer among many, take it with a grain of salt.
I hope you find some of this useful...
Update: I specifically said "don't use prototypes", yet I left the prototype in all versions...removed.
...roboticus
When your only tool is a hammer, all problems look like your thumb.
In reply to Re: Scrape a blog: a statistical approach
by roboticus
in thread Scrape a blog: a statistical approach
by epimenidecretese
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |