Since the node is in the FAQ section it seems like a specific answer to the most frequently asked question about linking to CPAN makes sense. I just thought it was the wrong answer. Maybe it was the wrong question.
In reply to Re^2: propose updating node about linking to cpan modules
by Lotus1
in thread propose updating node about linking to cpan modules
by Lotus1
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |