This is a great idea that could be applied elsewhere as well. For instance, I never know what to do when a node suggests a new feature that I disagree with (sorry tilly). I'd like to be able to '++' the node for being well thought out, well written, adding to the community, etc. but *also* be able to '--' the idea. Sort of an "I appreciate the effort, but disagree with the suggestion" stance.

I've seen at least one instance (can't remember where) in which the author posted an AM followup for people to cast votes on the idea of his original post. This sounds very similiar to what you propose with Book Rankings.

It's the difference between "Good Review." and "Good Book."

-Blake

In reply to Re: Book Ranking by blakem
in thread Book Ranking by hsmyers

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.