Boy! Did I get the wrong impression. When I went to the CPAN to examine JSON. That page led me to additional JSON resources: http://www.json.org/. Which had many additional JSON related links. One of which was JSON Editor Online. This was a few days ago, and the last association I had in my mind, where JSON was concerned. Unfortunately, the wrong association/impression.
Sorry for all the noise, and thank you very much for taking the time to respond.
--Chris
¡λɐp ʇɑəɹ⅁ ɐ əʌɐɥ puɐ ʻꜱdləɥ ꜱᴉɥʇ ədoH
In reply to Re^4: Are there any issues with JSON
by taint
in thread Are there any issues with JSON
by taint
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |