considering its age, no wonder perl5 has many grammar in-consistence and pitfall. If you want a cleaner, more consistent language, perl6 is preferred.
I am trying to improve my English skills, if you see a mistake please feel free to reply or /msg me a correction
In reply to Re: There's scalar(), but no list(). Perl could need one for rare but reasonable use
by xiaoyafeng
in thread There's scalar(), but no list(). Perl could need one for rare but reasonable use
by flowdy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |