Less is more:For example, $time->mon returns the month number (1-12) while $time->m +onth returns the abbreviated name of the month.
I much prefer the above documentation over renaming mon() and month() to month_number_starting_with_January_at_index_zero() and abbreviated_month_name(), or verbose 'explanations' cluttering up the place. Perhaps day_of_week() could say "same as $t->_wday()", but it seems pretty obvious to me that that is the case.$t->mon # 1 = January $t->_mon # 0 = January $t->monname # Feb $t->month # same as $t->monname $t->fullmonth # February
I infer from your response that, as far as you know, the answer to the question I asked is that there is not an explanation of Time::Piece::_wday in the module's documentation.You infer incorrectly. IMHO, the amount of explanation already given is sufficient, and very little, if anything, should be added.
In reply to Re^7: Gettting the last Friday of every month using Time::Piece
by runrig
in thread Gettting the last Friday of every month using Time::Piece
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |