It would surprise me immensely that you could possibly “benchmark” the encryption of such a minuscule string of data.
--- I am not sure either, but I cannot draw conclusion before trying it. For transactions in million level, probably it might matter.
I would suggest that you simply choose, and use, an off-the-shelf crypto library that you know will be readily available in your environment. You won’t go wrong with OpenSSL. Is there a compelling reason for you to look farther afield?
--- Currently we are using Crypt::RSA, since we are working on this part of the code, we just want to explore whether there is a 'better' solution. It seems Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA is another one. It never hurts to ask Monks for more, then we can compare and choose a better one.
If so, tell us – what is that reason? (This will help us to provide you with a more targeted answer to your real use-case.)
--- I really don't have any convincing reasons to make change, but it won't hurt if there are indeed some better modules to do the job. The user case is, I need to process patient information and need to encrypt/descypt some sensitive patient data. Thanks.
In reply to Re^2: any alternative modules for asymmetric encryption besides Crypt::RSA?
by khandielas
in thread any alternative modules for asymmetric encryption besides Crypt::RSA?
by khandielas
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |