Clearly, but not Actually:
You can make a 1:1 mapping of reals in the range 1..2 to reals in the range 1..3 (using a -1*2+1 pattern)
Thus, contrary to the obvious answer, there are exactly the same number of numbers in both ranges.
In reply to Re^4: My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:
by SuicideJunkie
in thread My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:
by chacham
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |