As the current implementation of threads tries to simulate parallelism within one interpreter,
After 24 hrs of thinking about that statement, I cannot make it gel with my knowledge that each thread starts a new interpreter.
Given it is you, I assume I'm just misunderstanding your drift?
In reply to Re^2: The problem with "The Problem with Threads"
by BrowserUk
in thread The problem with "The Problem with Threads"
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |