Apologies. The tone of your response led me to re-read my post, and on reflection I understand how it might have seemed like a flame. This was not my intent at all.
In your message to which my post was a reply, you began with a rhetorical question concerning how welcome your subsequent comment expressing surprise at the use of MS Word would be. I was expressing my own surpise at your surprise.
Dismay? Yes, perhaps. Disappointment? Well, okay. But surprise? It seemed slightly stronger than seemed appropriate on an off-topic post, ...
dmm
Just call me the Anti-Gates ...
In reply to (Re:) x 4: Regular Expressions in Perl: tutorial section (10 chapters) completed
by dmmiller2k
in thread Regular Expressions in Perl: tutorial section (10 chapters) completed
by japhy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |