Thanks - I ordered a few bits and pieces last night actually! Got a very cheap programmer, handful of avrs, breadboard etc, and I will have a tinker when I get a chance. I decided to get the bare chip because it dosent seem much harder to put the bootloader on yourself from what I read yesterday and its cheaper for multiple chips so if I break them when breadboarding I wont be too annoyed. One thing I noticed though was that adding network support seems tricky / has reliability problems (what with the IRQs required etc) so I wonder for a network attached control and monitoring device, perhaps the pi is still the better way to go? Would be interested in opinions.
Thanks, PeteIn reply to Re^4: Device::BCM2835, hardware access on a pi, SIGSEGV
by Peterpion
in thread Device::BCM2835, hardware access on a pi, SIGSEGV
by Peterpion
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |