{I have|I've} been {surfing|browsing} online more than {three|3|2|4} +hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. {I +t's|Itis} pretty worth enough for me. {In my opinion|Personally|In my + view}, if all {webmasters|site owners|website owners|web owners} and + bloggers made good content as you did, the {internet|net|web} will b +e {much more|a lot more}useful than ever before.|
And you have already identified a set of generated alternatives.(like considered spam and reaped)
What would be the best approach to backengineer the original pattern to form a regex like this to match spam:
.*? been .*? online more than .*? hours today, yet I never found any +interesting article like yours. .*? pretty worth enough for me. Yadda + yadda ...
My best guess till now is to use Bayesian filter on words to identify text units which are close enough to belong to the same spam template.
In the next step I would try to analyze those from left to right to find common sequences of words and to fill in the wildcards.
Any better idea?
Cheers rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
In reply to analyzing spam patterns by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |