By low level , is it that it is not an efficient way to traverse directory structures ?
low level in the sense that its a waste of programmer time common waste of noob time. Path::Tiny uses readdir so that you don't have to. File::Find::Rule uses readdir so that you don't have to. Its convenience, why spend 15min-2hours to reinvent Path::Tiny/File::Find::Rule each time you have a problem?
was just reading up about Path::Tiny on CPAN. It says it does not try to work in non-Windows and non-linux mode.
And is that a concern for you? :) Today? :) Usage share of operating systems
also i see it has quite a few dependencies and wondering if it was pure perl or not, which might be a deciding factor for me ? I ran the following command to check the above ... which gave me the output
And what does that output tell you? :)
Path::Tiny -> http://deps.cpantesters.org/?module=Path%3A%3ATiny;perl=latest
In reply to Re^4: print last file updated into directory
by Anonymous Monk
in thread print last file updated into directory
by fabrizio_start_perl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |