Instead, I mean it to be "against the grain" as in the reverse of the "jenga tower".
I understood your drift, but I think that whilst it might make some sense to those in the know at the beginning, it would rapidly be lost over time and to those without knowledge of the history.
The are other reasons:
Hence so many C++ sites/posts end up spelling it out: Cplusplus, which is just wrong.
Is that better or worse than predecremented Perl.
A bit like Yahoo!'s pling that means they'll forever be the subject headlines like "Yahoo! Made! $8bn! In! One! Day! And! You'll! Easily! Guess! How!", "'Yahoo! Breaks! Every! Mailing! List! In! The! World!' says email guru", "Marissa! Mayer! ends! 21! month! dry! spell! as! Yahoo! sales! grow!", "Yahoo! finally! releases! Flickr! app! for! iPad! BUT! shuns! Windows! fans!"
In reply to Re^12: The future of Perl?
by BrowserUk
in thread The future of Perl?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |