Your question is pretty challenging because I'm not sure if there is any (internationally) valid canon of (even undergraduate) CS studies.

Furthermore I doubt that even 10% of the colleagues I met on job (or monks I met here - sorry ) had more than a basic grasp of what I learned in the first 2 years at uni.*

And some things I already studied in high-school like combinatorics, algebra and probability theory are only part of undergraduate studies in other countries.

Saying so, I don't think it was the content which mattered, but rather the methodology to cleanly define a problem, to find proper names for the "things" involved and the ability to look-up available research /tutorials on the field.

In the end I have to look-up the details again after years not using them.

But at least I know where to look and that they exist.

Keep in mind that things are evolving far too fast in CS to still be valid after a few years.

Now I could start dropping names like

... which might have been essential in my uni but but not in the next one.

(My professors where all from two groups, either a degree in Math or Electrical Engineering. CS as a faculty was too young for "real" CS profs)

So my advice is

Finally: a little search led me to this MIT stuff https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/, but there are certainly also other sources.

I'd browse thru it and pick the stuff that motivate you.

One major obstacle though ... they require you to learn some Python! ;-P

HTH! :)

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice

update

*) which is also biased b/c my profs used to push their research fields. And being at a technical universities meant plenty of research fields.


In reply to Re: OT: Computer Science for (a couple steps up from) Dummies by LanX
in thread OT: Computer Science for (a couple steps up from) Dummies by Your Mother

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.