Perhaps the word "magic" pre-disposes a programmer against it. Especially us non-tolkien fans. But thinking about it more I say it aids transparency as far as I can know who reads or modifies my variablles. However, if by "magic", variables are unxplainedly altered then that's ACME territory.
Is this "magic" not the same as having a private variable within a class only accessible via magic hooks aka getter and setter methods which may spawn many actions in addition to getting and setting a variable?
In reply to Re^4: Monitoring a variable during refactoring
by bliako
in thread Monitoring a variable during refactoring
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |