Moose, MOP, Moo, Mouse, and the advances that have arguably made Perl5 a superior OO language to Python and Ruby and Java
I'd like to see that argument!
I'm not against it; I'd just like to see:
My perception of Moose is that it is an expensive getter/setter generator. My perception of MOP is that is provides for introspection -- that has few if any legitimate uses.
I'd like to be persuaded that I'm wrong.
In reply to Re^3: The future of Perl?
by BrowserUk
in thread The future of Perl?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |