Fair enough on the wording. I've trimmed the post down a bit. Unfortunately that might make these comments seem out of context, but you're right, less is more.
As for the module name, I agree it's longer than I would prefer, but it's a name that describes its purpose better than ::v or ::mv, or any other name I could come up with as I was working on it. I could let the parent::versioned distribution provide parent::v, for those who wish to save some keystrokes. I'll keep the thought opened to see if any consensus arrives.
Dave
In reply to Re^4: parent::versioned supports minimum version specification in parent classes
by davido
in thread parent::versioned supports minimum version specification in parent classes
by davido
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |