How a backwards compatible successor to Perl5 should be named ... no idea. Maybe leaping to 10 like Autocad did?
But I agree that this must be accompanied with clear improvements like signatures (and/or an OO System).
Anything else would be quickly ridiculed as marketing gag.
> that Perl 6 hurt Perl 5 particularly or in the grand scheme.
I claim Osborning, AFAIK Perl5 releases in the 200x years were rare because everybody was expecting Perl6 to arrive. That's a normal psychological effect.
And when Perl6 was officially released I personally witnessed the aftermath of a very strange and loud discussion of my clients to switch as soon as possible to the "newer version".
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
PS: FWIW: you may want to watch my talk about "The Camel Paradox" (not sure if slides and sound are out of sync or if I was in Muppet mode again ;-)
In reply to Re^12: Ovid's take on the renaming of "Perl6" (updated)
by LanX
in thread Ovid's take on the renaming of "Perl6"
by 1nickt
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |