This thread and your previous thread sound to me like you're leaning towards reinventing wheels instead of using File::Spec to its full potential. I might suggest that you explain what your algorithm is trying to do, and perhaps we can suggest a better approach.
In reply to Re: File::Spec::Win32 returning different result than File::Spec when doing catfile with empty string
by haukex
in thread File::Spec::Win32 returning different result than File::Spec when doing catfile with empty string
by nysus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |