"There is a lot of code in the book that I would be angry to find in production today"
I feel that this statement sums up how many people feel, although I've got nothing to back that up.
That said, I even suggested a relatively old book where things wouldn't be 'proper' now. What's fantastic, is that there aren't many other above-compiled languages that can state that a 21-year-old book will give you the same results then, as they would now.
In reply to Re^4: Any other good perl books
by stevieb
in thread Any other good perl books
by catfish1116
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |