I say: Wait and see.
If you mean to wait until perl6.org has become raku-lang.org and the rename has really been completed, then I fully agree! (And I should have probably said this in the root node.)
But if you mean to wait for something else, then I ask, wait for what? In the situation I mentioned, people wouldn't even consider asking a Raku question on PerlMonks because it's not clear they can. And yes, I'm aware it's a hypothetical, but OTOH, it doesn't make sense to me to e.g. "wait" for some other website (SO) to become more popular than PM for Raku questions before clarifying a policy that was already present in the first place.
BTW, from your earlier post:
And we have many slightly off topic discussions here around JavaScript, SQL or Python.
My understanding from the gods' posts on this topic so far is that the point is that Raku / Perl 6 questions are not off-topic, i.e. the policy isn't "we tolerate Raku posts here the same way we tolerate other OT posts sometimes", but instead "despite the name, PerlMonks is for Raku as well". But that's just my interpretation, so perhaps the gods could clarify at some point.
In reply to Re^4: Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks
by haukex
in thread Inclusion of Raku on PerlMonks
by haukex
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |