If someone can't be bothered to use strict; use warnings; what makes you think they'll be bothered to use 5.12; instead? cavac's point was the on-by-default aspect and I agree that a major version bump is precisely the time to revisit such a beneficial but backwards-incompatible change.
It's hardly such a great task to mitigate either. If someone really wanted to run code without the safety net then all they need to do is add no strict; no warnings; and they're done.
In reply to Re^3: If Perl 5 were to become Perl 7, what (backward-compatible) features would you want to see?
by hippo
in thread If Perl 5 were to become Perl 7, what (backward-compatible) features would you want to see?
by haukex
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |