On machineA, there is a folder where images are constantly updated.
It sounds like this might be the crux of the problem. Why not have this "folder" on MachineB instead? Then MachineA could remote-mount this via sshfs or similar and the image capture procedure can carry on, wilfully ignorant that it's really writing to MachineB. Does this solve the problem for you?
In reply to Re: Copy files around network (OT)
by hippo
in thread Copy files around network
by cristofayre
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |