I thought of that and wish now I had mentioned it in my writeup. There is no chance of a name collision in that example since the year, month and day are repeated in the new name. For example:
8_2007_10_22_15_34_23_Table_-_20071022_XYZ_W3.pdf 8_2007_9_22_15_34_23_Table_-_2007922_XYZ_W3.pdf
The new filenames for these two will be:
Table_-_20071022_XYZ_W3.pdf Table_-_2007922_XYZ_W3.pdf
Having the sorting correct only matters among the filenames that start with the same YYYY?MDD dates. The HH_mm_ss format seems to be consistent and therefore sortable with the default sort. I'm assuming that from the limited example data we were given.
In reply to Re^3: Batch file renaming - on identical name, keep only most recent file, based on dates
by Lotus1
in thread Batch file renaming - on identical name, keep only most recent file, based on dates
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |