The HH_mm_ss format seems to be consistent
It seems not, given one of the datetimes shown in the OP is '2019-6-12T22:34:8'.
There is no chance of a name collision in that example since the year, month and day are repeated in the new name.
IMHO that's also a very dangerous assumption to make.
In reply to Re^4: Batch file renaming - on identical name, keep only most recent file, based on dates
by haukex
in thread Batch file renaming - on identical name, keep only most recent file, based on dates
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |