Thanks, but using low-level commands is faster. For us speed (and thus accuracy) is very important.
I have tested your code on my computer and the average difference from a second is +0.00006222222222222222, which again is more by two decimal places than the difference of the negative_timer (which is -0.000000676723442).
In reply to Re^2: The most precise second (timer)
by tukusejssirs
in thread The most precise second (timer)
by tukusejssirs
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |