Consider the following:

sub foo { say "Pragma out of scope:"; say for @INC; } { use lib::lexical 'path'; say "Pragma in scope:"; say for @INC; foo(); }

If the pragma modifies @INC and resets it at end of scope, foo will see the change. A hook is by far the easiest solution. Otherwise, you have to convince the parser to handle use, require and do differently than normal.

do and require can be done using an opcode checker, but use can't be done that way because of its compile-time effect. Maybe a call_parser/call_checker would work?

Anyway, I don't see the point of such a pragma. One a module is loaded, it stays loaded regardless of any changes to @INC, so the effect of changing @INC is global even if the change is temporary.


In reply to Re: A lexical lib pragma? by ikegami
in thread A lexical lib pragma? by perlancar

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.