Well, you faked a copy from an actual test.
Think about it.
What should I think?it mimicked the REPL you are using. I did even fake the sequence number! D'oh!
Mine is different, I use perlsh from Term::ReadLine::Gnu (hacked to suit my needs), and this was the actual test using it:
package main; # [498] ~ > vec($m0,$_,1)=1 for 0,2,8,9,10 result: '' package main; # [499] ~ > scalar reverse unpack 'b16',$m0 result: '0000011100000101'
So not only am I a fool, but a dishonest person also, a liar and a faker, whose code is not to be trusted. At all!
update: No Sir, I did not pretend to show tested code, as you claim after having edited your answer (without note). I did, and you can beat me to death for that, forget the scalar. Next.
In reply to Re^5: Displaying bit-vectors with Most Significant Bits to the left?
by shmem
in thread Displaying bit-vectors with Most Significant Bits to the left?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |