I certainly did not think your post sounded either pompous or snobbish. I hope I didn't give you the impression that I thought that. I ran your snippet using backticks with dir. Output:
Volume in drive C is OVID Volume Serial Number is 1A46-1A08 Directory of C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\Curtis' Stuff . <DIR> 01-27-01 9:14a . .. <DIR> 01-27-01 9:14a .. WWW <DIR> 11-18-00 11:45a WWW CGI_CO~1 <DIR> 09-30-00 2:31p cgi_course ARCHIVE1 <DIR> 08-25-00 9:53a archive1 PERL <DIR> 08-26-00 11:27a Perl TIDY <DIR> 10-15-00 5:33p tidy DK BAT 39 12-10-99 8:38p dk.bat ...[snip]... HTMLTO~1 PL 2,968 06-18-01 7:25p HTMLtoCGI.pl WEIRD~1 HTM 1,504 06-18-01 7:20p weird.html 17 file(s) 161,721 bytes 9 dir(s) 510,001,152 bytes free $dirsize: 33
I am using Win98 and ActiveState 5.6.0 on my home machine. Perhaps I'm lucky, I don't know, but Perl has never caused any problems on my box.
Cheers,
Ovid
Vote for paco!
Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.
In reply to (Ovid) Re(3): Perl on Win98 vs. Win/NT/2000?
by Ovid
in thread Perl on Win98 vs. Win/NT/2000?
by jlongino
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |