I didn't know that! Is the logic behind replacing the sub with a string expression, to fool the cache?
use Benchmark 'cmpthese'; cmpthese(-2, { predecl => ' my $y; my $x; for $x (1..10000) { $y+=$x } ', lexical => ' my $y; for my $x (1..10000) { $y+=$x } ', }); __END__
Rate lexical predecl lexical 3996/s -- -0% predecl 4001/s 0% --
vs
use Benchmark 'cmpthese'; cmpthese(-2, { predecl => sub { my $y; my $x; for $x (1..10000) { $y+=$x } }, lexical => sub { my $y; for my $x (1..10000) { $y+=$x } }, });
Rate predecl lexical predecl 4011/s -- -0% lexical 4015/s 0% --
Which is more or less what haukex and choroba demonstrated.
In reply to Re^3: declaring lexical variables in shortest scope: performance?
by bliako
in thread declaring lexical variables in shortest scope: performance?
by bliako
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |