I think you're right, in a typical database situation.
But one could imagine a case where the database is small enough to fit in memory. If that is combined with a read-mostly database, the above could be a good fit.
I wish I had the time and the hardware to make a good benchmarked comparison, but alas.
In reply to Re^2: Shared DBI handle supporting threads and processes
by erix
in thread Shared DBI handle supporting threads and processes
by marioroy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |