That way requires a LOT of trust in the safety of Safe.
Perhaps so, but I do not expect that trust to be misplaced. Tcl uses the same concept for its "safe" interpreters and I do not recall any exploits in either that Tcl facility or Perl's Safe. Do you have a counterexample?
The safe way of saving and restoring data is to handle it as data, not as code.
I agree that that is the preferred option, but interface constraints from existing systems can interfere.
In reply to Re^4: unable to eval dumped hash
by jcb
in thread unable to eval dumped hash
by nysus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |